Top Times & Team Rankings

Top Times

Starting with the 2016-17 season MISCA will exclusively use Prepswimming for our top times list. The site will allow coaches to upload multiple meet and team results and provide a more accurate and indepth list. Please visit the links below for more news an instructions.

PrepSwimming.com
 How to Register  How to Upload
How to Create a Hytek Result File
www.prepswimming.com
www.collegeswimming.com

 

Team Rankings

Boys 2016-17
Division 1 Division 2 Division 3
Brother Rice Ann Arbor Huron East Grand Rapids & Cranbrook
Ann Arbor Skyline Dexter & Groves
Novi & Saline Chelsea
De La Salle Holland Christian
 Holland West Ottawa Seaholm Spring Lake
Zeeland Grosse Pointe South Otsego
Forest Hills Central Walled Lake Northern Byron Center
Northville Rochester Adams Wayland Union
Ann Arbor Pioneer Temperance Bedford Grand Rapids Christian
Rockford & Farmington Harrison Portage Central & Midland Dow Marshall
Others: Detroit Catholic Central, Livonia Stevenson, Canton, West Bloomfield, Grandville, Walled Lake Central, South Lyon, Troy, Brighton, Jackson, Grand Haven, Salem Battle Creek Lakeview, U of D Jesuit, Okemos, Mattawan, Allen Park, Saginaw Heritage, Holland Others: Riverview, Flint Powers, Country Day, Dundee, Milan, Alma, Notre Dame Prep, Sturgis, St. Clair, DeWitt, Grand Rapids Catholic Central, Hamilton, Haslett, St. Johns, Allegan
Updated: 3/4/17
Team Rankings are based on 2 factors:
1)      A projected State Meet. Previous season’s returning swimmers & re-scoring relays after replacing missing relay swimmers. This ‘projected State Meet’ groups teams who are close together. As the season progresses new swimmers develop into likely top-8/16 finishers; returning swimmers are lost (sick, injured, transfers, etc.); and most importantly new key relay swimmers are developed. The projected relay placement changes substantially as the season progresses. 2)      Then the second factor is the estimation of the relative dual meet strength of teams. This factor is largely used to sort teams who are close together in the State Meet Projection. Actual dual meet results are figured into this relative dual meet strength