Top Times & Team Rankings

Top Times

Starting with the 2016-17 season MISCA will exclusively use Prepswimming for our top times list. The site will allow coaches to upload multiple meet and team results and provide a more accurate and indepth list. Please visit the links below for more news an instructions.
 How to Register  How to Upload
How to Create a Hytek Result File Swim Cloud Direct Export
How to Use Rankings in Setup your Schedule in

Team Rankings

Boys 2017-18
Division 1 Division 2 Division 3
Ann Arbor Skyline Dexter Holland Chrisitan
Holland West Ottawa Rochester Adams East Grand Rapids
Brother Rice Seaholm Cranbrook
Saline De La Salle Spring Lake
 Northville Groves Byron Center
Catholic Central Midland Dow Grand Rapids Christian
Forest Hills Central Grosse Pointe South Flint Powers Catholic
Zeeland Temperance Bedford GR Catholic Central
Ann Arbor Pioneer Portage Central Marshall
Farmington Harrison & Rockford Walled Lake Northern & Berkley & Oscar A. Carlson Otsego & Alma & Country Day
Novi, South Lyon, Ann Arbor Huron, Livonia Stevenson, Canton, Hudsonville, Grandville, Grand Haven, Troy, Howell, Brighton Saginaw Heritage, U of D Jesuit,  Holland, Grand Rapids Northview, Jenison, Okemos, Battle Creek Lakeview, North Farmington, Fraser, Walled Lake Western Hamilton, Milan, Riverview, Allen Park, Trenton, DeWitt, St. Joseph, Wayland Union, Chelsea, Tecumseh
Updated: 3/7/18
Team Rankings are based on 2 factors:
1)      A projected State Meet. Previous season’s returning swimmers & re-scoring relays after replacing missing relay swimmers. This ‘projected State Meet’ groups teams who are close together. As the season progresses new swimmers develop into likely top-8/16 finishers; returning swimmers are lost (sick, injured, transfers, etc.); and most importantly new key relay swimmers are developed. The projected relay placement changes substantially as the season progresses. 2)      Then the second factor is the estimation of the relative dual meet strength of teams. This factor is largely used to sort teams who are close together in the State Meet Projection. Actual dual meet results are figured into this relative dual meet strength