Top Times & Team Rankings

Top Times

Prepswimming has moved their operations over to swimcloud.  The site will allow coaches to upload multiple meet and team results and provide a more accurate and in-depth list. Please visit the links below for more news and instructions.

SwimCloud.com
SwimCloud.com
Collegeswimming.com

SwimCloud Support

Your Account/Team
Team Pages Information
Setting up your team page
Updating your team’s conference, league, class, or affiliation
Someone is missing from my roster

Meets
Uploading meet results
Updating team schedule
Setup live results
Building an event list


Top Times/Rankings
Team rankings
Adding top times to your website

Hy-Tek – Team Manager & Meet Manager

Team Rankings

Girls 2018-19
Division 1 Division 2 Division 3
Mercy Rochester Adams East Grand Rapids
Saline Seaholm Cranbrook
Farmington-Harrison Dexter Marian
Rockford Groves Holland Christian
Ann Arbor Skyline Byron Center Milan
Brighton Midland Dow Grand Rapids Christian
Northville Grand Rapids Northview Hamilton
Hudsonville Forest Hills Central Chelsea
Holland West Ottawa Portage Central Notre Dame Prep
Ann Arbor Huron Holland, South Lyon & South Lyon East Marshall
Grand Ledge, Grand Haven, Ann Arbor Pioneer, Stoney Creek, Lake Orion, Clarkston, Bridgman, Grandville, Holt, Canton, Novi, Hartland Grosse Pointe South, Saginaw Heritage, DeWitt, Grosse Pointe North, Fenton, North Farmington, Battle Creek Lakeview Flint Powers, Grand Rapids Catholic Central, South Haven, St. Clair, Tecumseh, Harper Creek, Spring Lake, Trenton, Country Day, Dundee
Updated: 9/5/18
Team Rankings are based on 2 factors:
1)      A projected State Meet. Previous season’s returning swimmers & re-scoring relays after replacing missing relay swimmers. This ‘projected State Meet’ groups teams who are close together. As the season progresses new swimmers develop into likely top-8/16 finishers; returning swimmers are lost (sick, injured, transfers, etc.); and most importantly new key relay swimmers are developed. The projected relay placement changes substantially as the season progresses. 2)      Then the second factor is the estimation of the relative dual meet strength of teams. This factor is largely used to sort teams who are close together in the State Meet Projection. Actual dual meet results are figured into this relative dual meet strength