Top Times
Prepswimming has moved their operations over to swimcloud. The site will allow coaches to upload multiple meet and team results and provide a more accurate and in-depth list. Please visit the links below for more news and instructions.
Team Rankings
| Boys 2018-19 | ||
| Division 1 | Division 2 | Division 3 |
| Holland West Ottawa | Dexter | Holland Christian |
| Ann Arbor Skyline | Groves | East Grand Rapids |
| Detroit Catholic Central | Seaholm | Spring Lake |
| Brother Rice | Midland Dow | Cranbrook |
| Ann Arbor Pioneer | Rochester Adams | Hamilton |
| Hudsonville | Portage Central | Grand Rapids Christian |
| Saline | De La Salle Collegiate | Marshal |
| Farmington-Harrison | Grosse Pointe South | Milan |
| Northville | University of Detroit | Otsego |
| Forest Hills Central | Holland | Trenton |
| Brighton, Rockford, Zeeland, Livonia Stevenson, South Lyon, Bloomfield Hills, Plymouth Salem, Ann Arbor Huron, Walled Lake Central, Novi, Grand Haven, Howell, Monroe | Byron Center, Berkley, Temperance Bedford, Oscar A. Carlson, Okemos, Walled Lake Northern, G. R. Northview, Walled Lake Western, Saginaw Heritage, North Farmington, Battle Creek Lakeview, S. C. Lakeview, Jenison, Grosse Pointe North | Flint Powers Catholic, Chelsea, Alma, Tecumseh, Wayland, Grand Rapids Catholic Central, Country Day, Riverview, St. Joseph, Grand Rapids Ottawa Hills, Harper Creek |
| Updated: 12/23/18 | ||
| Team Rankings are based on 2 factors: | |
| 1) A projected State Meet. Previous season’s returning swimmers & re-scoring relays after replacing missing relay swimmers. This ‘projected State Meet’ groups teams who are close together. As the season progresses new swimmers develop into likely top-8/16 finishers; returning swimmers are lost (sick, injured, transfers, etc.); and most importantly new key relay swimmers are developed. The projected relay placement changes substantially as the season progresses. | 2) Then the second factor is the estimation of the relative dual meet strength of teams. This factor is largely used to sort teams who are close together in the State Meet Projection. Actual dual meet results are figured into this relative dual meet strength |