Top Times

Prepswimming has moved their operations over to swimcloud.  The site will allow coaches to upload multiple meet and team results and provide a more accurate and in-depth list. Please visit the links below for more news and instructions.

SwimCloud Support

Your Account/Team

Swimcloud For High School Teams Slide Show
Team Pages Information
Setting up your team page
Updating your team’s conference, league, class, or affiliation
Someone is missing from my roster

Uploading meet results
Updating team schedule
Setup live results
Building an event list

Top Times/Rankings
Team rankings
Adding top times to your website
Understanding the new Swimmer Rankings Page

Hy-Tek – Team Manager & Meet Manager

Team Rankings

BOYS 2020-21
Division 1 Division 2 Division 3
Ann Arbor Pioneer Seaholm East Grand Rapids
Holland West Ottawa Grosse Pointe South Cranbrook
Catholic Central Ann Arbor Skyline Holland Christian
Northville Groves Hamilton
Saline U of D Jesuit Grand Rapids Christian
Hudsonville Farmington Mason
Rochester Brother Rice Spring Lake
Troy Forest Hills Central Milan
Brighton Dexter Pinckney
Macomb Dakota Stoney Creek Country Day
Ann Arbor Huron, Oxford, Canton, Plymouth, Novi, Zeeland, Bloomfield Hills, Macomb
Dakota, Grand Haven, Chippewa Valley, Forest Hills NE, Lake Orion..
Midland Dow, Temperance Bedford, Portage Central, Battle Creek Lakeview, Fenton, Jenison,
Berkley, Grosse Pointe North, Byron Center, Grand Rapids Northview, De La Salle
DeWitt, Marshall, GR Catholic Central, Plainwell, Dundee, Otsego, Allegan.
Updated: 3/22/21


Team Rankings are based on 2 factors:
1)      A projected State Meet. Previous season’s returning swimmers & re-scoring relays after replacing missing relay swimmers. This ‘projected State Meet’ groups teams who are close together. As the season progresses new swimmers develop into likely top-8/16 finishers; returning swimmers are lost (sick, injured, transfers, etc.); and most importantly new key relay swimmers are developed. The projected relay placement changes substantially as the season progresses. 2)      Then the second factor is the estimation of the relative dual meet strength of teams. This factor is largely used to sort teams who are close together in the State Meet Projection. Actual dual meet results are figured into this relative dual meet strength