Top Times

Prepswimming has moved their operations over to swimcloud.  The site will allow coaches to upload multiple meet and team results and provide a more accurate and in-depth list. Please visit the links below for more news and instructions.

SwimCloud.com
SwimCloud.com
Collegeswimming.com

SwimCloud Support

Your Account/Team
Team Pages Information
Setting up your team page
Updating your team’s conference, league, class, or affiliation
Someone is missing from my roster

Meets
Uploading meet results
Updating team schedule
Setup live results
Building an event list

Top Times/Rankings
Team rankings
Adding top times to your website
Understanding the new Swimmer Rankings Page

Hy-Tek – Team Manager & Meet Manager

Team Rankings

GIRLS 2020-21
Division 1 Division 2 Division 3
Ann Arbor Pioneer Rochester Adams Cranbrook
Saline Seaholm Marian
Rockford East Grand Rapids Bay City John Glenn
Northville Grosse Pointe South Hamilton
Mercy Groves Plainwell
Novi Ann Arbor Skyline Holland Christian
Brighton Farmington Tecumseh
Grand Haven Dexter Spring Lake
Plymouth Portage Northern Grand Rapids Christian
Ann Arbor Huron Fenton Milan
Others: Canton, Holland West Ottawa, Zeeland, Grand Blanc, Lake Orion, Bloomfield Hills, Salem, Oxford, L’Anse Creuse North, Hudsonville Others: Temperance Bedford, Forest Hills Central, Midland Dow, Stoney Creek, Portage Central, South Lyon East, DeWitt, Holland, Jenison Others: University Liggett, Grand Rapids CC, Grosse Ile, Trenton, Chelsea, Dundee, Flint Powers, Country Day, Notre Dame, Allegan
Updated: 8/21/2020

 

Team Rankings are based on 2 factors:
1)      A projected State Meet. Previous season’s returning swimmers & re-scoring relays after replacing missing relay swimmers. This ‘projected State Meet’ groups teams who are close together. As the season progresses new swimmers develop into likely top-8/16 finishers; returning swimmers are lost (sick, injured, transfers, etc.); and most importantly new key relay swimmers are developed. The projected relay placement changes substantially as the season progresses. 2)      Then the second factor is the estimation of the relative dual meet strength of teams. This factor is largely used to sort teams who are close together in the State Meet Projection. Actual dual meet results are figured into this relative dual meet strength